CRESP CRESP

Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation

   


HOME

MISSION
 
Summary of Work

CONSORTIUM MEMBERS

TASK GROUPS

STAFF DIRECTORY

CRESP Newsletters
CRESP Update: SRS
CRESP Update Hanford

  Mission

CRESP began operation in 1995 after receiving a competitive cooperative agreement from the Department of Energy.

A key purpose of CRESP is to test the viability of the 1994 National Academy of Sciences's conclusion.........

the Environmental Management Office of DOE needs an independent institutional mechanism to develop data and methodology to make risk a key part of its decision making.

CRESP works to fulfill its mission by improving the scientific and technical basis of environmental management decisions leading to

  • advance protective and cost-effective cleanup of the nation's nuclear weapons
  • enhance stakeholder understanding of the nation's nuclear weapons production facility waste sites

CRESP pursues this mission through a unique institutional model:

  1. its primary mode of operation is an unprecedented program of interdisciplinary university research;
  2. it is independent and its beneficiaries are those who have a stake in effective cleanup of federal facilities;
  3. it is organized to provide both guidance to and peer review of the evolving effort to utilize risk methods and evaluations to shape cleanup decisions at DOE sites.



CRESP:
Summary of Work





RESEARCH:

  • Every CRESP research study is designed to reduce a significant uncertainty about risks at DOE sites which delays or confuses the implementation of cleanup. CRESP continues to assess the economic and other trends around DOE sites to clarify land use issues in risk management.
  • CRESP works to relate new toxicological and epidemiological techniques to risk tools that better target remedial efforts.
  • CRESP seeks to better connect occupational surveillance and care to worker risk evaluation.
  • CRESP has formulated new approaches, utilizing the tools of geographic information systems (GIS), to generate site-wide exposure assessments.
  • CRESP scientists are linking findings from research on site wildlife contaminant burdens to criteria that appraise both ecological vitality and food chain effects.
  • CRESP has undertaken research projects that link scientific, technical, occupational, engineering and behavioral aspects of risk-based environmental management of these sites. While actively publishing in the peer-reviewed literature, CRESP's eight discipline-based task groups work effectively across disciplines in cutting-edge research activities which cannot be addressed by any one discipline alone.


Return to Mission
Return to Summary of Work



STAKEHOLDERS:

CRESP is committed to integrating risk evaluation with the concerns and duties of various stakeholders, including regulators, who are affected by or are responsible for DOE cleanup.

CRESP is seeking to understand the perceptions, dynamics and interests among stakeholders as it responds to their requests for data and technical perspective:

  • CRESP defines its research in response to stakeholder questions;
  • CRESP strives to explain clearly its own research results and risk evaluation results.


Return to Mission
Return to Summary of Work



GUIDANCE AND PEER REVIEW FOR GENERIC RISK PROCESSES:

CRESP has also organized its diverse skills to review, and make recommendations to improve, the existing risk evaluation methods and processes being developed by the Department of Energy. CRESP is also asked either to assess or review key documents or activities where risk evaluation shapes decision-making


Return to Mission
Return to Summary of Work



CRESP'S RESEARCH AND OUTREACH GROUPS:

Eight separate but interdependent task groups have been established to organize research and operations for CRESP. Researchers are drawn from faculty and staff from the Environmental and Occupational Health Science Institute (EOHSI- a program jointly sponsored by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Rutgers University) and the University of Washington, with research goals and activities guided by the Management Board.

Multiple projects are underway at each university and within each task group. Scientific interactions among the task groups and between the universities are actively encouraged. Each university is currently focusing on site-specific research on issues and concerns raised primarily at either the Hanford and Savannah River DOE sites but with potential complex-wide significance.

The eight task groups are:


Return to Mission
Return to Summary of Work